|
|
The Barry Larkin Experiment |
| Posted by fanofreds on
Sunday, February 19, 2012 at
7:34:25 PM |
I know I haven't been terribly active over here at YouGabSports, but that doesn't mean I haven't been plenty busy writing! In fact, as some of you may know, I run my own blog over at Blogger (Nachos Grande). Although I've branched into a lot of baseball card stuff over there (rather than the "old me" which was mostly writing current articles about MLB), I still do a few posts dedicated to baseball in particular. One such venture actually combines the two - my Barry Larkin Experiment.
Basically, I'm a huge fan of Barry Larkin and with his Hall of Fame induction coming up this summer I figured it would be a fun idea to host a competition on my blog designed to figure out which Larkin card (from my collection) was the best. Right now, I'm working my way through the first 100 cards - four at a time. Each poll has four cards featured and two of the four cards move on to the next round (the two highest vote getters). The interactive part in the process is that all voting is done by my blog readers!

Right now, I have two polls going on (including this one) for two different rounds. If you'd like to get in on the fun, plus perhaps learn a little something about myself, Barry Larkin, and/or baseball cards in the process - I invite you to keep checking back as more polls are added!
|
|
Comments?(4) |
|
Nacho's Take; Why the Pirates Aren't the Devil |
| Posted by fanofreds on
Monday, August 23, 2010 at
6:19:29 PM |
Posted first on my blog - Nachos Grande.
If you've paid any attention to sports news today, you already know that the Pittsburgh Pirates' internal books got leaked somehow. Furthermore, you know that the Pirates have "won by losing" as so many talking heads have spouted on radio and TV today. In fact, they've "won" by a tune of about $29.4 million in 2007 and 2008.

Apparently, most people are up in arms about the Pirates. I listened to MLB Radio on Sirius today on my way home from work where Jim Bowden (I think) said that the Pirates' spending pocketing of all that revenue sharing cash would end up being a huge problem in the next collective bargaining agreement. While Bowden may be correct in his conclusion, he (and many others whom I heard or read from today) is completely off base when it comes to how they feel about the Pirates.
The Pirates are not the devil.
At least, they aren't the devil any more than the Yankees or Red Sox are the devil.
Here's why: Pittsburgh, according to MLB representatives, has fully complied with the rules governing spending*. As such, they are playing by the same set of guidelines as every other club, including the big boys like New York, the middle guys like St. Louis, and the so-called poor paupers like Florida. Pittsburgh, however, has taken a different route to the ultimate goal of every professional sports team. Making a profit.
Sure, it's an ugly way to get there - jettisoning players such as Jason Bay, Jack Wilson, and Matt Capps to keep payroll at a bare minimum, but it's a legitimate way to earn money. And, as the leaked numbers prove, Pittsburgh is making money.
Of course, many people (and most pundits) aren't willing or able to understand that. Instead, they've been focusing on the sentimentality and illusion of playing the game "the right way." The Yankees, they all say, play the game the right way. They abide by the rules and pay their luxury tax so that they can acquire the best players to help them win. The Yankees play to win they say.
Wrong. Well, not wrong in so much as not correct enough.
The Yankees don't play to win - they play to win so that they make money. By the transitive property, the Yankees play to make money - and I'm not begrudging them of that in any way. Going back to the Pirates, most say the Pirates play to lose. I say the Pirates play to lose to make money - once again meaning, the Pirates play to make money (just like the Yankees).
In short, neither the Yankees nor the Pirates are living up to the sentimental "play the game for fun" idea. Both teams, like every other professional franchise, are playing to make money. Do you honestly believe that there would be a professional league in any sport if the teams/players/owners etc. didn't make money? If you do, look no further than the XFL or the women's soccer league.
Finally, going back to the Pirates one last time, consider the following: If you were offered two jobs, one where you worked 5 days a week for a decent salary, and the other where you worked 2 days a week for a salary slightly hire than the first job, which would you take? I'm guessing the second choice - which is essentially the same choice the Pirates made.
You see, the Pirates aren't the devil; they are simply too much like us. We'd rather our sports players be heroes and our sports teams live up to lofty goals like "playing to win" rather than dealing with the bottom line. Unfortunately, it's the bottom line that keeps sports going - and because of that, the Pirates aren't the devil, they just aren't any better than you or I.
*There is some debate about this point. If it is eventually discovered that Pittsburgh has somehow circumnavigated the rules and lined management's pockets with cash, well, then Pittsburgh might be the devil after all.
|
|
Comments?(0) |
|
Edinson Volquez Gets a 50 Game Suspension. No Big Deal? |
| Posted by fanofreds on
Saturday, April 24, 2010 at
12:47:21 PM |
Note: Originally published on my blog Nachos Grande.
So, it turns out Edinson Volquez got busted for performance enhancing drugs.
His punishment? 50 game suspension.
Actual number of games that he'll miss since he's currently on the 60 game DL? Zero.
That's inexcusable.
Look, I'm a Reds fan...and believe me, I know how much the Reds need a healthy, efficient Volquez in the rotation. However, my loyalty to the Reds doesn't force me to be a blind idiot. If Volquez broke the drug rules (which he admits he did), then he deserves the fair punishment which is 50 games missed not 50 days-while-on-the-DL-where-he-wasn't-going-to-play-in-those-games-anyhow games missed. It's already arguably unfair that pitchers and position players both get the same punishment but a pitcher only pitches every 5 days or so while a position player hits the field almost every day...but suspending a guy when he's already not allowed to play because he's on the DL - that's simply a perversion of the rules.
Here's the upshot of what happened for all other major leaguers, specifically those who are injured:
If you are on the 60 day DL you might as well take some performance enhancing drugs, heal quicker, and still get to play when you "normally" would. Sure, you lose 50 days of salary - but you'll make a lot more money by being a "dependable" player since you came off the DL with a healthy, drug-infused body!
And that, dear readers, is why the so-called suspension is actually a big deal.
|
|
Comments?(0) |
View All
|
|
|